There's literally no story!#6: Purple Flower.The isolation works because it's the only color. $581.00 for 7 days. SharpStar Askar ACL200 200-mm f/4 astrographic telephoto lens, Astrotrac 360 tracking platform first impression, FIELD TEST: CARL ZEISS APOCHROMATIC & SHARPEST (CZAS) BINOVIEWER, Deus_Ex_Mamiya and Michael Covington like this. parts of your main subject extend beyond the DOF range it will never look flat. . The spec sheet for the Rokinon 135mm F/2 boasts a number of qualities, with the ones listed below being the most important when it comes to night photography and astro. Some real life images from my photoblog: http://hellabella.de, One of the best and sharpest lens around. So, let's see where it falls short of perfection: It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. 10/10 (Editor's Choice) Check Price. This summer I'm going to try the lenses out for LRGB images to see how they perform. There is no such thing, in my opinion. The Image Sensor Frame tool lets you enter in the size of your camera sensor, and focal length of your lens (or telescope) to display a frame over the star map. EF-mount only, this packs more megapixels, a bigger sensor, and a high max ISO. I recommend the author change the title of his article from "The Best Telephoto Lenses." to "Some Inexpensive Telephoto Lenses I Have Tested" The original title generates a claim and expectation in the reader that his article can't support that leads to reader frustration and just more questions; why didn't you test this one or do this etc. I've done comparisons between my brand-new Samyang 85/1.4 and the old big Apollo 135/1.8 lens I had lying around, and the shots were for all practical purposes identical (exept, obviously, for the pixel count once cropped). Are you really using 135 a lot? Still, what a time to be an enthusiast/photog, so many nice options. Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. Using the lens's diaphragm interferes with the light path and results in diffraction spikes which I find unattractive. I have the Sony SaL 135F1.8 Zeiss Lens and think that is excellent. This seems to be the norm for telephotos. And yet this review is on front page of DPReview prompting me to go and buy this lens -- so surely it must be a professional , well grounded review, right? There are quite a few other excellent lenses out there, and nowadays, quite a few that can be used wide open. For portraits and with a high MP body I'd be more inclined than ever to just go 85mm, and for other uses it's hard to pass up the zooms' versatility, but I still there's still room for 135s in some kits and some formats. I dont mean to be rude, but I fail to see any photographic comparison or test to display the quality of this lens against others, concerning coma or anything else, except considerations on the manual focusing, its shape and ergonomic. With a rounded 9-blade diaphragm, shallow depth of field imaging will be rendered with pleasing out-of-focus highlights. The image below highlights the creative freedom this lens provides. To actually learn to compose the photos so that the background complements the image instead of being something that must be blurred away. Litepanels Studio X2 Bi-Color LED Fresnel Light. To remedy this, I reduced the star size in post, and I started shooting at F/4 to really tighten things up. The 135 f/2 is not perfect. Camera tech for video has come a long way in recent years, with faster autofocus, subject tracking, eye tracking and smarter lenses that stabilize the frame. What next, an article extolling the virtues of 43mm, or 70mm? Imaging Resource 1998 - 2023. Really like the large focusing ring. (purchased for $970), reviewed March 17th, 2011 The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC is one of the most affordable and practical lenses for astrophotography on the market. Rokinon FE14M-C Lens. If you aren't completely set on the 135mm, the 200mm f/2.8L is a fantastic lens and i think its less expensive than the 135mm f/2L. My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! Focus throw. Has a good weight to it. Nevertheless, it performs excellently on most star fields, and is too cheap not to acquire. Comment * document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "a0721c0ca7d0974fd27b5d0ceb81918a" );document.getElementById("cfd2c22fe2").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Your email address will not be published. For the rest there is Sigma 135 /1.8 Art also fantastic value lens. These lenses can be had on eBay in mint condition for around $70, and are probably the most price efficient optical instrument in the world. D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. Now - THAT's a lens everyone should have ;). Unfortunately it is not manufactured in a multicoated version, and produces prominent internal reflection artifacts on very bright stars. The full name of this lens is the Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC, with ED standing for extra-low dispersion, and UMC referring to the ultra multi-coated optics. I need fast auto-focus, predictable focus lock and natural, vibrant color rendition. You're right, but a headshot is exactly where I want to see all those megapixels I bought put to use! I just got the Samyang version of this lens and used it with my Canon 3ti on a Skywatcher Star Adventurer. I think the bokeh won me over with the cat, as well as the fact that I like animals; the case for the duck was the same. The 135 L handles this well. Flip on through what we found, and see how the lens performs in the real world in our sample gallery. Other times, like the Witch Head Nebula, I love seeing the star responsible for the object in all its glaring glory! But I would argue that a 135mm F2 lens produces even greater bokeh, thanks to the long focal length that compresses the background far more than the 85mm lens. The 135 is lighter, but that's its only advantage. I've recently started using 135 and 200mm lenses from the 1970s with my mono CCD and they've proven very useful for imaging large emission nebulae. The lens hood is removable (and reversible), which makes packing the Rokinon 135mm away into the included lens pouch possible. I disagree. If this was used to shoot video you would think that the first image was using a green screen. In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. These were just a tad less sharp at the corners than their Canon competition, but certainly extremely sharp all over the field if closed down one stop or even half a stop. Seems to me that with your gallery and website of images you should refrain from passing judgment on who is and isn't a photography master. Because of chromatic aberration, no telephoto lens can be used at full aperture. The aesthetic quality of the blur in the out-of-focus parts of the image are buttery smooth and soft. A Bargain, very competively priced I have heard others mention that this lens has a plasticky build quality, but I believe this aspect has been improved. But again i am just at the beginning and i also do not want to use now a telescope. Olympus 4x Optical Zoom f/2 Lens; 25-100mm (35mm Equivalent) Show More. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. Definitely now on my to-buy list. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. Proper composition, light and retouching are much prefferable to crazy gooey bokeh. In these situations, a portable, wide-field imaging rig wins. (purchased for $1,625), reviewed January 27th, 2010 Contrasty, saturated, nice colours. Since i am totally new in this field, i would like to start with astrophotography but using my existing camera (Fuji XT-30). It has just a hint of chromatic aberration on very bright stars and, if highly enlarged by 400-800%, the stars in the very corners barely begin to show a touch of astigmatism. Rokinon lenses are made in Korea, and so is the Samyang variation. Bond, I expect you to buy! As soon as e.g. The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. 85 Is a different story, my 85 gets used a lot. http://www.flickr.com/photos/tbrigham/314771597/ However, I find the process tedious, and prefer single, manually guided, long exposures which seem to have deeper colors. Typical L construction. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. One very popular lens for bokeh fiends is the Canon 85mm F1.2it can produce extremely creamy out of focus backgrounds. However, for $15 I also bought an old Tamron Adaptall 2, 135 mm f2.5. For some objects a reflection can take away from the photo because it covers interesting details of the object (Think Alnitak in the Horsehead Nebula). don't get me wrong; this lens will take great photos, but the 'flatness' i was getting in my photos nearly had me give up 25 years of hobby photography. I cant seem to find this documented anywhere. AHAB. Off topic, In this post, Ill explain why I think the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is the perfect addition to an arsenal of astrophotography lenses. Particular properties of modern 135/2 lenses are resolution with e.g. Check out some of the photos he took. I have used and still use the 135MM F/2 l lens. I own a 135 since the film days (because you "had to have one" and could not afford much else), still have the zeiss Jena f3.5 M42 and even jumped for the zeiss f2.8 for my yashica when they were sold for next to nothing. i also have the 300mm f4.5 non ED nikkor which is quite nice . Another drawback is the focal length. The Bokeh includes as well all that is in the focus, but mainly talked about how it comes visible in out of focus areas. (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". Samyang should definitely make 135 f2 with the same optical formula and AF for Sony EFF and also Nikon F plus Canon EF mount if possible. 1. If you're using or are looking to buy the Samyang or Rokinon 135mm F/2, please let me know what you're imaging with it or any questions you may have in the comment section below. Check out Samyang 135 f/2 astrophotography gallery Below some pictures I made using Samyang 135 lens with QHY163 mono camera and iOptron Smart EQ Pro mount. The screws should be set sufficiently tightly to prevent shift, yet not so tightly as to interfere with fine focusing. Would it at all be possible to at least make sure the people you publish know a little bit about photography? A specialist lens, at best, though I did enjoy the cat image. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? Some people like these, and consider them decorative. Although this lens feels solid, it is rather light when compared to a telescope. For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. Its a trade-off, and one that seems to surface time and time again in this hobby. Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . When I got home and loaded the photo into Lightroom I was blown away by two things. We were very impressed with X-T5's 40-megapixel APS-C sensor, check out some full resolution images! If You can not, buy Canon EF 85/1.8, which delivers quite similar results. It is fantastic on my old 5d. As you'd expect though, distortion and light falloff are both higher with a full-frame image circle, but perhaps not as much as you'd normally expect. Because it's an L-series lens by Canon, you can be sure that the image quality and performance of the 24-105mm meet the demanding aspects of astrophotography such as focus and star quality. Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. As a complete beginner in Astrophotography should I buy Rokinon 135mm lens or Canon EF 75-300mm lens with Canon EF 50mm lens? I've owned a few L lenses and while their USM motors have always been quick to snap in focus, this 135mm is on a different level. The aperture ring is marked with each f-stop, and you need to manually click through F/2 F/22 and watch the blades do their work. This is perhaps because I'm more of a zoom guy (I have the trio of Canon f2.8 L zoom lenses, with coverage from 16mm to 200mm), and I didn't see that big a difference between my 70-200 f2.8 and my 135 f2except I could cover a lot more with my zoom than I could with a prime. The 135mm F2 lens design is truly special, and in this article (and the video I made), I want to try to convince you as well. With this lens you don't need to do much if any post processing. At a local amateur soccer game using the 135 f/2 the action was almost always too close, or too far away. Overall, the lens feels very solid and well constructed. I have compared many times my 135/2 against my 100/2.8 and there is a big difference. The Rokinon website lists this lens as being useful for portraiture photography, and most telephoto applications. But for many of us, somewhere in between, are plenty of short to mid-tele lenses that will deliver solid service (in terms of subject separation) without carrying around still another kilo for the sake of more blur. That's a cheap, fun date for AP. And if you want autofocus, I would recommend the Canon 135mm f2.0L, which is incredibly light for its performance at just 750g. Photography is full of fuzzy concepts. Although typically unused in astrophotography, I did get a chance to see the beautiful bokeh this lens creates when shooting at F/2. "Bokeru" is a verb, and it can apply equally to to optical and psychological effects, including the reduced mental clarity that can some with age. No one yet mentioned a zoom lens, I had an opportunity to test my Canon 24-105L f/4 on M31 Andromeda Galaxy and received wonderful results with Canon 60D unmoded, I set it to 105mm, No vignatting, slight coma on the corners and no false color on bright stars. The focuser adjustment ring on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is excellent, but fine-tuning your critical focus on a bright star at F/2 will take some trial and error to get right. The presentation and hands-on look and feel of the 135mm F/2 lens is impressive considering the reasonable price of this lens. Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) Just like the above samples, most are just bad. Orion nebula shot with Canon T3i and Rokinon 135mm @ F2.0 150 shots with dark bias and flats stacked and edited. Do you have a link to Yuri's photo stream? Over the years, I have tried more than two dozen telephoto lenses, until I finally found three or four perfect solutions. Otherwise, on FF body this lens is wonderful. You won't get the excessive background blurr -- which for the beginning photographer may actually be a good thing. The 200f2.8 L is excellent - I am using it right now. Really excels as indoor sports lens on a crop camera. I guess thats where practice will come in handy. Thanks for the fine article and the thought you put into it. There is no agreement about what Bokeh means. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. This lens has only two drawbacks. At $900 US it a relative steal. Yeah I agree that the sentiment that they were designed to be used stopped down is wrong as they were designed to be used wide open because they had to be for speed (my point above). KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. The APO showed no chromatic aberration at all with the addition of the Astronomik UV/IR cut clip filter (passing 380-680nm), but the telephoto lenses, even when stopped down, showed a tight bright red ring around all stars. Touching the telescope, even ever so slightly, will introduce vibrations which will ruin the photograph. Robert. Well saturated but neutral. Sure, the Nifty 50 is an incredible value (and a LOT cheaper), but the 135mm puts you within range of some of the best astrophotography targets in the night sky. I have the Canon EF 135mm, f2L USM. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. This is great news if you like to photograph small things up close. I do not see much difference in background blur or bokeh. I do know, however, that I can take an equally framed photo I've shot with my Canon kit lens, both zoomed to 100% I run circles around this guy. But I hardly used it in the 30+ years. In this new review, I focus exclusively on the unprecedented Samyang 135mm f/2, which is primarily designed for portrait and wildlife. Thanks, Chris, hi Trevor my name is sagar i have same lens but i have one question why lot of stars are appearing in my image which is taken thru rokinon 135mm, Your email address will not be published. (on a full frame camera)Wonderful lens for some portraiture applications, sporting events and candids at a party or event. We've selected a group of cameras that are easy to keep with you, and that can adapt to take photos wherever and whenever something memorable happens. The second best, is the Hoya Pro One Digital MC UV(0) filter. The lens is so crisp that the diaphragm blade pattern is visible on point light sources shot at large aperature. What is it like shooting with one today? tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej We case our eye over the options costing more than $2500 but less than $4000, to find the best all-rounder. @juksu - you're such a hypocrite. Another article that I read only the headline and saw a couple of samples then jumped directly to comments. The Samyang 135mm F/2 easily lives up to its hype and should be near the top of your list of purchases if you are new or experienced in the field of astrophotography. Available Monday. Big F-value.Light. Many lenses lose their appeal after time, but not this one. This thing is a beast in comparison. Since Eric was so generous to share his images with me, I had to include his photo of the Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex as well. Agreed. Super Sharp.Super Fast AF. A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. I would recommend buying it used if you want to save some money, with the added benefit that you can re-sell it at the same price as you bought it for, effectively giving you the opportunity to "rent it" for free. Hi Thomas As far as I know, the Nikon D500 is not modified for astrophotography out of the box (it includes a built in IR cut filter that blocks much of the 656nm wavelength). I am no stranger to the full manual control of this lens, for both aperture and focus. Micael Widell is a photography enthusiast based in Stockholm, Sweden. DPReview March Madness, round one - vote! Available in other Styles, Configurations & Kits. There are, of course, outlierssuch as the legendary unicorn lens Canon EF 200mm F2but that one isn't a great alternative unless you are cool with spending $5,700 and carrying around something about as wieldy as a fire hydrant. I have taken some of the coolest photos with this lens on a canon mark III which shoots ten frames per second. Seems like a great lens. Here's what I see from the photographs:#1: Woman in traffic. Bottom line, this is just an outstanding lens by any measure, one that makes clear why you'd want to pay the freight for expensive prime glass. I've been using a vintage FD 135/3.5 on my A7R IV as a compact tele option, often alongside a tiny Samyang 75/1.8. It is harder work than using a zoom lens, and some shots I just cannot get at all (cannot get close enough, or far enough way) but the shots I do get are so much nicer looking than I get with any other lens that for me and my goals it is a fair trade off. This new, affordable wide zoom for L-mount is capable of some excellent landscapes. They create a beautiful, mesmerizing dreamscape in their photos, and their secret weapon, besides an impeccable sense for aesthetics, is the 135mm F2 lens. Recently, the FAA announced that recreational drone pilots in the USA can request LAANC authorization to fly in controlled airspace at night. Of my last 3500 shots only 62 were made with the 135 f/2. It could really use an update to its coatings. You can use Stellarium to preview the image scale with the 135mm lens and your DSLR. It just doesn't get any better than this! Family moments are precious and sometimes you want to capture that time spent with loved ones or friends in better quality than your phone can manage. I will say that at F/4 this lens is extremely sharp corner to corner when used on my 60Da. And with our first long lenses we were all impressed were we not? Can't argue with your reasoning, Juksu, about the framing of the article, but just stopping by to say I really liked that cat picture, am shopping for a new smartphone, struck that this type of photo is in another league - all newbie observations, of course, which sort of supports your thoughts that an article like this would be better framed as a "Love this new long lens stuff" sort of thing. These are affordably available on eBay, and result in perfectly round star images, the way nature intended them to be. Lenses with extreme sharpness and bokeh tend to be heavy. One is its size and weight, which requires a sturdy support on the telescope. The size (3.2 x 4.4"/82.5 x 112mm) and weight (1.7 lb/750g) (and color) of this lens are not imposing - you probably won't get much attent Second night out with mine right now and I am here in the comments looking for the part number or link! The 135mm focal length is absolutely perfect for the Heart and Soul Nebulae if youre using a crop sensor DSLR camera. Thomas, I do have no experience with the Canon lens you mentioned but zoom lenses have limitations concerning aberrations while providing more flexibility.The Nikkor 70-200/4 that I like as a travel lens is a very good performer but the Zeiss 135/2 APO is in a different league. I think the readers would welcome contributions from other members' experiences. There is some controversy about the use of UV filters, but I found that a good UV filter significantly improves contrast, sharpens small star images, and reduces chromatic aberration. Most of the available 135mm F2 lenses have a very short minimum focusing distance in relation to the focal length, creating a magnification ratio of around 0.2 - 0.25. I don't know about other photographers but I do not have many applications for this focal length. The only thing that could possibly make this better would be to add IS. But even better BOKEH is the SAL-135F2.8F4.5 STF (Smooth Trans Focus ) which has even better BOKEH, albeit a manual focus lens. Helps me as a beginner a lot The lens is not weather-sealed, so you definitely dont want to leave your camera and lens (and your tracking mount!) So I sold it for nearly what I bought it for and chalked it up to a learning experience. You can go lower, but you have to watch your technique. After the first exposure in M mode, the camera throws an error saying Error please press the shutter button again. Often need f2.2 to f2.8 to gain sufficient DOF for human subjects. You can barely tell it's a pond.#3: Duck.Birds with bokeh are fine. A lot of lenses today are better than anything money could buy in 1980. My work requires auto-focus. (purchased for $1,100), reviewed October 5th, 2008 The 70-200 f2.8 L2 and he 400f5.6 will however set you back way more than $1.100. If you want to preview the image field you can expect with a particular camera sensor and lens combination, Stellarium features a useful tool. Best lenses for astrophotography: 50, 85 and 135mm - DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging - Cloudy Nights Cloudy Nights Astrophotography and Sketching DSLR, Mirrorless & General-Purpose Digital Camera DSO Imaging CNers have asked about a donation box for Cloudy Nights over the years, so here you go. One of my very best lenses! Don't know what the young man uses as his camera, and if he has tried to keep the noise under control, or even tried to focus on the eyes of the mallard, or the cat (their eyes are not truly in focus). (purchased for $900). It is the lens I use as a reference point to compare all new lens acquisitions to after purchase to determine if they need to be returned for repair or replacement. These lenses go about as close as you could get without a dedicated macro lens. Here are our top picks for the canon lenses for astrophotography. This article was originally published on Micael's blog, and is being republished in full with express permission. Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. All content, design, and layout are Copyright 19982023 Digital Photography Review All Rights Reserved. (purchased for $700), reviewed June 13th, 2009 p.s. The flat lens hood design allows you to easily take flat frames with the Rokinon 135mm using the white t-shirt method or using a flat panel. I have a 135mm f2.8 lens I've used for wide DSOs but mostly I use 200mm. I found with the 70-200 made me lazy. After weeks with a production Fujifilm X-T5, Chris and Jordan have some final thoughts. 45 minutes. Sharp wide open, wonderful bokeh, fast AF in dark conditions. When the aperture is stopped down to 37mm using step-down filter rings, this lens produces incredibly tiny pinpoint star images from edge to edge. They were not however designed to be bokeh monsters though that was just a side effect of making them fast and people bought them for speed with bokeh being the afterthought so not Bokeh for the sake of Bokeh as he said. I had one question that i cant seem to find an answer to.. Please ride off on the same horse you rode in on. Ive captured a lot of deep-sky astrophotography targets from the northern hemisphere, but Im usually in too deep to capture an entire region of space at once. It has no chromatic aberration, and no hint of star deformities in the corners. Thanks! It also focuses really fast and accurate and is light. Sure, that would be swellbut it doesn't matter with regard to how it performs. Thanks & Cheers To achieve creamy bokeh, a lens should have a wide maximum aperture and a long focal length. The Sadr Region in Cygnus, including the Crescent Nebula by Eric Cauble.
Wentworth Golf Club General Manager, Daily Police Logs Coos County, Erdem London Fashion Week, Masseter Botox Affecting Smile, Articles C